smythereenz (July 9, 2009 at 8:52 pm)

I did and I do minus a few details. But that's no different from other tools that I like. It is currently #2 on my short-list of VC SW.next, your post is not a "reply" to mine as mine addressed the quality of Schwartz's preso, not git itself. Many of Torvalds's and Schwartz's comments are based on CVS which is on the fast-track to obsolescence and was long before git. They MIGHT say something interesting if they understood that branching and merging are not inherently expensive nowadays.

cyborgtroy (July 1, 2009 at 7:14 am)

So why don't you install git and use it?See if you like it or not.

smythereenz (June 15, 2009 at 3:10 am)

OMFG* !!! What a ~shill! !! !He said NOTHING that cannot be read online. He never really addresses what GIT does for real version-control; just makes claims about right and wrong and how GIT does it right. Not much different than Linus's talk in that way - devoid of a real useful message.This is just one more video to put an well-known OSS face w/ Linus's latest toy - and let's not forget the brand assocation w/ Google via a - oooo - Google Tech Talk.

deagla (May 4, 2009 at 12:57 am)

Eh, the Illuminati is run by reptilian kin known throughout history as Jinn, Naga, Angels/Demons, Dragons, Dracul, Al Gore, Windsors, Rothschilds etc. that rule the inner circles of Freemasonry and do foul sex&torture rituals. They'll probably release a bird flu virus via vaccines(or by drones), go to internet 2, start WW3 w/China, have a staged alien invasion(2010) to get a microchipped pop/world gov but they will fail! Support FreemanTV, Alex Jones, Dr.Deagle, David Icke&Project Camelot!

lmschnorr (April 2, 2009 at 1:27 am)

they would be the same object

lingwitt (March 28, 2009 at 5:56 am)

In other words, it's not as fun ;-)

fragglet (March 4, 2009 at 5:15 pm)

In all likelihood, it explodes. But the chances of this happening randomly are quadrillions to one against. In practical terms, just make sure you don't use git to store your proof of concept SHA1 cracking code.

unsignedint (February 9, 2009 at 9:43 pm)

To order to that to happen, same user with same changes has to commit at same time in same repository.Technically highly unlikely, like magnitude of winning highest payout in lottery consecutively, but if it ever does happen, I think it'll treat it as a same commit. (although, SHA1 is cryptography known that can collide, this is still unlikely.)

boostconsulting (January 23, 2009 at 1:19 am)

Right around 46 minutes, where all the salient information is, the guy starts to speed up, presumably because he's running out of time. It takes a lot of pause and rewind to get the material.

M1C1S (October 17, 2008 at 7:48 am)

theonebubbat: I guess that would break git. But chances are really small to accidently find two different files with the same SHA1. That's always a problem when using hashes ;-)

theonebubbat (October 11, 2008 at 10:34 am)

So what does git do if two objects wind up having the same sha1?

temospreamo (July 11, 2008 at 9:44 am)

This Video is 60 minutes looongcool