Inganotodden (July 12, 2009 at 1:13 pm)

T-90 sucks. The only reason so many of them where made is that the soviets put all their tank-building capabilities into it. Its slower and less agile. And it is a killer for its own crew. If the engine goes the whole crew goes. And the firing-mechanism has this bad habit of cutting off the arms of the gunners.

CRYSIS132 (July 12, 2009 at 12:10 pm)

leopard use by swedsih army

lmandozal (July 12, 2009 at 10:52 am)

It was a Challenger 1.

kalleanka887 (July 12, 2009 at 10:16 am)

Bigger is not always better. Leopard has a range of 4000 meter and almost the dubble penetration.

kalleanka887 (July 12, 2009 at 10:15 am)

There is no upradeted t-90. The speed is just 60 and 65 in downhill whit home longing

MajorDumai (July 12, 2009 at 10:13 am)

to kalleanka887:Upgraded T-90 speed ~80km/h

JBBlitz (July 12, 2009 at 10:09 am)

only 3 tanks could destroy a T-90 abhram Merkava and the Challenger.

JBBlitz (July 12, 2009 at 10:06 am)

T-90 has a bigger gun and more armor to it, but less mobility than a leopard, T-90 had more productivity than a leopard too.

gabrocki (July 12, 2009 at 9:53 am)

lol i remember that episode of Mr. Bean :DD it was a russian tank? LOL.

kalleanka887 (July 12, 2009 at 9:51 am)

And by the way. Leopards speed is 72km/hT-90s is 60km/h

kalleanka887 (July 12, 2009 at 9:50 am)

Leopard DM 55 gun penetates 810 mm armor at 2000mT-90 canonon penetrates 550 mm at 2000.So Leopard has better canon. And thicker armor to.

sage1119 (July 12, 2009 at 5:31 am)

The T80 and the T90 can't do shit to the Leapord,It would be like killing a baby with a shotgun when it has a lego gun.