gnamp (May 19, 2009 at 11:01 am)

And thank you for proving mine.

ktasda (May 19, 2009 at 9:05 am)

Thank you for proving my point Gnamp

gnamp (May 14, 2009 at 4:16 am)

I tried with you, you awkward blighter ~really, I did. You wouldn't know 'relevant' if it bit you on the arse (which it probably would). You talk rubbish. You are a curmudgeon and a dullard; apparently devoid of any real sense of humour or fun. Just Get bgack tgo ygour worgk direcging G-g-oogle [ahhh...] Universigy, you silly bugger. Good day, sir.

ktasda (May 14, 2009 at 2:45 am)

Considering the content of the video it is not so much out of the norm considering this is a very interesting topic I certainly frown upon your comment it is neither constructive , productive or even relevant it is just some low brow remark makes me question your age keep it on point this video is to do with the content not the manner in which is was presented.

gnamp (May 13, 2009 at 5:27 pm)

look, get stuffed man. I'm not picking on anyone. If a man who is introducing a talk on cryptography speaks in a most unusual or cryptic fashion, expect it to be noticed. It's funny. I'm sure he's a lovely chap etc. etc. but it's an amusing observation- it's as simple as that. Besides, you thought I meant the other guy anyway. He was just nervous.

ktasda (May 13, 2009 at 12:24 pm)

I'm not the one picking on people

gnamp (May 5, 2009 at 1:28 pm)

That's true. Or you for that matter.

ktasda (May 5, 2009 at 1:12 pm)

Even if he has a speech impediment, Doesn't make gnamp any less of a ass

ZirconCode (May 5, 2009 at 1:10 pm)

Agreed

koforeverk2 (April 23, 2009 at 2:12 pm)

ghcfhjdrykpcotj^prthsyoehgesghdgfhjs^th^setrphyrot

gnamp (April 5, 2009 at 7:42 am)

er... no. It's a speech impediment.

ktasda (April 5, 2009 at 6:15 am)

He's nervous so stfu