ajmuscleman (July 10, 2009 at 6:58 am)

Oh, I don't think it's checkmate just yet, Chugga. If you were in an argument about the One, you are going to have to have an attempt at my intellectual vanity for him first. So let's get right to the point. Elton John: describe him and tell me why you described him the way you did!

peregrinusnoctis (July 3, 2009 at 8:06 pm)

evolution = evolutionary

peregrinusnoctis (July 3, 2009 at 8:05 pm)

:)I couldn't have said it more eloquently, concisely, or with so few words (especially that)!

peregrinusnoctis (July 3, 2009 at 8:01 pm)

Finally (probably)--if you'd take the time to learn a bit about our species's evolution path, you'd probably learn something useful about both human physiology and human culture.The main difference between you and I is that essentially fascistic edge; you're apparently all for the Church dictating morals, and the State creating and enforcing laws based upon those morals, with an iron fist. I say that my life is my own damned business, and need neither a nanny state nor an authoritarian one.

peregrinusnoctis (July 3, 2009 at 7:54 pm)

Pfft. Ridiculous. That's unquestionably unworthy of the argument--especially seeing as how I answered a foolishly-posed question. (However, your claiming a "win" here is completely in line with your tenuous grasp on reality.)The perversion issue is the reason that you avoid the biblical component. I have no aversion to being labelled by bigots. Were science to find some overwhelmingly negative aspect to incestuous marriage and breeding, I'd defer to it. Otherwise, it's fine with me.

chuggachuggawoowoo (July 3, 2009 at 7:47 pm)

Okay, I'm going to be merciful and let you off the hook. You obviously don't have a mind of your own and are unable to give a straight answer when asked a simple question. You can't answer because either way, you lose. If you say it's alright for a brother and sister to have sex, you look like a pervert. If you say it's NOT alright, then you are making a moral judgement about some else's bahavior, like I did with homosexuals. You can't win and you are backed into a corner. Checkmate. Take care.

chuggachuggawoowoo (July 3, 2009 at 7:36 pm)

Yeah, but I notice you still haven't answered. In modern society, in the year 2009, in civilized American/UK society, is it acceptable behavior for a brother and sister to have sexual relations? Yes or no.

marcos66990 (July 3, 2009 at 7:33 pm)

FUCK YOU MR CHUGGACHUGGA

peregrinusnoctis (July 3, 2009 at 7:25 pm)

agenda. = agenda).

peregrinusnoctis (July 3, 2009 at 7:24 pm)

Brilliant response. Thank Heavens, your insulting, issue-avoiding old self is back. No ADHD; high IQ.

chuggachuggawoowoo (July 3, 2009 at 7:21 pm)

Yeah...whatever...again, try to concentrate. Try to answer the question. Do you have ADD?

peregrinusnoctis (July 3, 2009 at 7:20 pm)

Oh--in modern USA/UK civilised society, eh? Ten percent of the world's population isn't much; are you suggesting that we--"the civilised white folks that run the world"--possess the only worthwhile views, here?I refute the notion that to be legal (or even cultural acceptable), something--anything, for that matter--needs to be deemed A-OK by me. That's my point, here. Unless science more specifically proves overwhelming risk, then it's fine by me.