KingBurkey (July 12, 2009 at 9:12 am)

I thought the 2003 hulk was pretty good even though I did like the 2008 movie more I think there both good

PrinceofPrin (July 12, 2009 at 2:10 am)

Either way, the Hulk is a hard movie to remake because you just cant have pure Hulk rampage and if there's no Hulk then the movie would be dull. I mean the reason why we see the Hulk is to see him transform and have a tantrum.Whatever, least they added the Avenger Initiative in Hulk 2008

shatav7 (July 11, 2009 at 11:23 pm)

si quieres ver la pelicula entera entra amundo mystico

tobuttica (July 11, 2009 at 10:32 pm)

I'll admit, I did like him in Star Trek, but as Bruce Banner, not very believable. Sorry. I would like to see him continue in a villainous role in future movies.

nx20007 (July 11, 2009 at 10:24 pm)

hm.. call me old fashiond.... but i think that without using special effects to much today's sf action movies would rock the tops... i mean we have the knoledge of how to use pupets, special effects, costumes to the best posible, and with a bit of digital enhancement and s/e they would become bestsellers in a matter of hours.....

schnubbel76 (July 11, 2009 at 8:37 pm)

Oh, give Eric Bana a try. I think he enjoyed Nero in Star Trek. Wasn't the best villian, of course not. But he was there and i felt he had fun, saying "hello christopher, i'm Nero" ;)

Godtron (July 11, 2009 at 11:13 am)

I think if you combine Ang's and the 2008 Hulk films together as one, youd have a nice Hulk movie. Each one was missing something that the other had too much of.

tobuttica (July 11, 2009 at 7:05 am)

The Hulk is supposed to fight a villain. That's what comic book movies are. Good guys vs Bad guys. I don't really count a giant bubble thing monster as a villain. If they'd kept Nolte as a sort of Absorbing Man, then it would have been not so blah. Plus Bana had no enthusiasm in the movie, like in all of his movies.

salum75 (July 11, 2009 at 6:16 am)

didn like the hulkcolor in the 2008 movie,no way!

samudoma (July 9, 2009 at 7:26 pm)

The movie from 2008 is for the masses ,the people that want only pointless action and special effects.But the angly lee movie was different it has some meaning ,and the acting was amazing.The cast was great.

dariunas (July 9, 2009 at 8:47 am)

I actually quite liked the 2003 movie. Especially the soundtrack. Sure, there wasn't lots of action, but when it came, it was good. Story wasn't faithful, conceptually, but it worked in the film and acting was consistent and solid. Really liked Eric Bana in this. Conelly was boring and those bits where Ang Lee splits the screen, comic book (or 24) style felt a bit pointless and tacked-on. Haven't seen the latest one so can't comment. But Tim Roth and Ed Norton are excellent actors, so will do!

bUdEmadY (July 9, 2009 at 3:42 am)

Great video!downloadmoviesfree. biz. nf