Montel turns the tables on a Fox Morning Television show
Mar/14/08 For details and updates visit http://... reported http://... that The Montel Williams Show has been cancelled just 3 days after appearing on Fox and Friends. I hope it is not because he supported the troops. In any case please join this campaign to get him back on the air. Please sign the petition at http://... 08:41 ET Montel Williams turned the question on live television when he choose to focus on the solders dying in Iraq rather than the passing of Heath Ledger. Montel did not return for a further segment.
lol Michael jackson vs Heath ledger hmmm hard comparison
XXX4656(July 11, 2009 at 2:43 am)
War in Iraq was an invasionFOX ADMITS IT @ 1:38so what happened to "pre-emptive" strike.Why should anyone mourn for a sinister invading force like a US soldier?!!!EPIC FAIL!!!!
halbie71(July 9, 2009 at 8:06 pm)
Yeah it is OK to make a big deal about Michael Jackson death right Montel?
xKaci88x(July 8, 2009 at 3:23 am)
Thats not to say I don't agree however. I definetely think they should stop talking so much about celebrities and focus on the real issues at hand. But it doesn't mean they shoudln't talk about a death like that at all. he's a person too.
xKaci88x(July 8, 2009 at 3:20 am)
People say that like its this great thing. Heath had said many times that he only got in the buisness to act. He hated being famous and didn't want that. He just liked the job itself and the projects. You say that like being a celebrity makes ur life perfect and it doesn't. Imagine not being able to walk out of your house because a dozen guys with cameras are following you around or having everything you do stuck in a newspaper like your an animal or something. Its no wonder they turn to drugs
onomxam(July 7, 2009 at 10:49 pm)
i thought he ws gona literally turn the table. i was wrong.
TulseLuper(July 7, 2009 at 9:17 pm)
We need somebody like Montel to make this point again on national television because this Michael Jackson worship is just getting nauseating.
cheeckybutnice(July 7, 2009 at 3:17 pm)
Im suprised they didnt cut him off like they normaly would do
benympls(July 7, 2009 at 12:53 am)
Yea i as i said my beef is larger than just FNC but meh everybody cant agree all the time and your obviously intelligent and its always good to hear another view from a intelligent rational adult. America will get thru this time and be smarter and stronger. Keep thinking for yourself . peace
jensen220(July 6, 2009 at 11:22 pm)
I disagree. I've watched many times where he's taken the opposing view in order to put both sides out to the viewers. But again, we digress from the original topic. The fact remains that Williams broached a subject that, on the surface seems legitimate, but as I said before, if pressed, I doubt he would've been able to give more information than that 28 people were killed. And to quote Forrest Gump, "That's all ah have tuh say uhbout that" :) Thanx for the cordial debate!
benympls(July 6, 2009 at 9:41 pm)
Perhaps you need to look up what "objective journalism" means.O'riely is furtherest thing from "fair&balanced" i must of miss the debate meets when "SHUT UP" considered a valid rebuttal. LOL! seriously when he has played devil advocate he's bring up their points to be shot down; "Well you know what they'll say on the left blah blah blah... i know, i know but thats what they'll say." Thats not playing devils advocate, when you do you argue it as if you believed it and full heartedly.
jensen220(July 6, 2009 at 8:49 pm)
It matters b/c it balances things out. If all you're getting is one side of the story, how can you judge what the truth is? FNC by far has the most balanced coverage of the important issues. O'reilly, for instance, always has both sides of an issue in his guests. And when one side isn't available, I've seen him take the opposite side to keep things "fair and balanced".
![Alicia Keys&Jack White - Another Way To Die [Official Video]](http://i2.ytimg.com/vi/hM5UJvnbbuY/default.jpg)
